Plan — nothing built yet v3 — investor use cases integrated 2026-08-24 ~30–40 dev-days once shaped

One chat for the whole portfolio.

A demo sub-version of LiveCEO, built from scratch for a family-office owner: five portfolio companies, one knowledge graph with drill-down, pre-built dashboards and competitor intelligence, board-call and pitch analysis with a searchable deck vault, alerts and a morning briefing — with the production voice interface on top, and mock data engineered to hold up under real questions.

This page is the deliverable. It's a build plan with 16 open questions for you at the bottom. Your answers shape what gets built; no code has been changed and nothing gets built until then. Your feedback is folded in as the operating layer (v2) and the investor layer (v3).
portfolio.liveceo.ai — Portfolio Home
FUND Vortex Games Portside Software Solstice Outdoor Northlane Financial Meridian Labs
Portfolio revenue
$212M
Agg. EBITDA
$31.4M
Risk flags
4 open
Companies
5
“Give me a one-line health check across the portfolio.”
The concept

What this demo is

You play the family-office owner. The demo answers the question every PE associate asks daily — “what's actually going on inside our companies?” — from the five core surfaces below — plus the operating layer (v2) and the investor layer (v3) — built on the same knowledge base per company that LiveCEO builds for real customers. It is a separate app built fresh, lifting LiveCEO's proven parts, not an adaptation of production.

01 · Portfolio Home

The top-level picture

A force-directed graph of the fund: 5 company nodes sized by revenue and colored by health, plus the cross-company connections (a board member on three boards, a shared vendor). An aggregate KPI strip and the voice dock live here.

02 · Company drill-down

Each company's knowledge graph

Click a company → its own full entity graph (LiveCEO's real 964-line GraphCanvas, lifted verbatim). Every node opens a real wiki page — teams, decisions, products, accounts — with citations. No dead ends.

03 · Pre-built dashboards

P&L, pipeline, dev status…

Deterministic, pixel-identical charts per company (not LLM-generated) — P&L, sales pipeline, dev status, credit book, integration ops, competitive matrix. Numbers are guaranteed to match what chat cites, by construction.

04 · Chat

Ask anything, get citations

The real LiveCEO agent engine (claude-agent-sdk, Sonnet, Read/Grep/Glob over the wiki — no RAG), lifted unmodified. Curated “killer question” chips guide the associate; every answer carries citation pills into source pages.

05 · Voice

Talk to your portfolio

The exact production voice stack: OpenAI Realtime over WebRTC (voiceClient.ts, zero changes needed). Scoped to the page you're on — ask the portfolio from home, ask Vortex from Vortex's page. Spoken summary + written cited answer on screen.

00 · The foundation

Mock data that doesn't crack

Every company gets a canonical financial model first; wikis and dashboards are both derived from it and lint-checked for agreement. If a dashboard says $4.2M ARR, chat says $4.2M. Details in Architecture.

New in v2 — integrated from your feedback

The operating layer

v1 answered “what's going on inside our companies?”. Your feedback adds the outside world and the day-to-day: how competitors are doing and where to beat them, what the internet says about each company, where every task stands, one briefing each morning — and generated decks/SWOTs that land in the dashboards gallery.

06 · Competitive Matrix

How competitors are doing — and how to beat them

A per-company dashboard: head-to-head vs. 3–4 named competitors, their recent moves (price changes, launches, layoffs, review-score slides) scraped from the live web, and explicit threat / opening flags. The key trick: the four invented companies compete in real markets against real companies — so the scraping is genuinely live even though the portfolio is fictional.

07 · Web signals job

What the internet says about each company

A scheduled daily sweep per company and per competitor — news, launches, reviews, hiring signals — written into each wiki as raw/web/… dumps, so chat and voice cite them like any other source. Reuses production's Perplexity-backed web-search lane (with its “part of this answer came from the internet” notice) and the existing cron-refresh pattern.

08 · Tasks & statuses

Every task, any kind, one board per company

The task tracker LiveCEO shipped this month, lifted into the demo: per-company boards for anything — register the entity, open the bank account, launch ads in Germany, ship the marketing site — with statuses, owners and due dates. The agent answers “what's blocked?” from the same data the board shows.

09 · Morning summary

One briefing to start the day

A daily digest on Portfolio Home: overnight web signals, tasks that moved, metric deltas, new risks — each line cited. One tap on the mic and the voice reads it to you while you make coffee.

10 · Generated decks & SWOT

“Make me a deck about Meridian”

Ask in chat: “SWOT analysis of Solstice” or “a one-pager on Meridian for the LP call” — production's artifact generator produces a full styled document live, and it lands in that company's dashboards gallery next to the pre-built views, shareable and reopenable.

Why this is cheap

All four lanes already exist in production

Web search (wiki-first-gated, cited), scheduled jobs, the tasks tracker + tasks dataset, and the artifact-generation pipeline with its gallery are shipped LiveCEO features — the demo repoints them at the portfolio instead of building them. Only the Competitive Matrix layout and the competitor registry are new.

New in v3 — investor use cases

The investor layer

The operating layer watches the market; this layer does the investor's actual job: is each company where its plan says it should be, what did the board calls really commit to, what have we seen in dealflow before — and what should wake us up. Two of these (13–14) add a whole new area to the demo: Dealflow, a sixth nav destination alongside the five portfolio companies.

11 · Plan alignment & bottleneck radar

Are they where the plan says they should be?

Each company gets a board-approved plan (milestones, budget, hiring) as first-class wiki pages, and an Alignment tab: plan-vs-actual drift, where the company is actually heading, and — the killer part — bottlenecks management isn't voicing: signals the data shows (a hiring req open 60 days, a QA queue growing, one engineer carrying a blocker) that never appeared in a board deck.

12 · Board-call analysis

What was actually said — and promised

Board-call transcripts land in each company's wiki (raw/meetings/… — an ingestion shape LiveCEO already defines). Every call gets a structured digest: commitments made, numbers claimed, plan changes, action items → straight onto the task board. The plan from #11 auto-actualizes after each call, so “on plan” always means the current plan.

13 · Pitch-call retrospectives

Every pitch, searchable forever

Pitch-call transcripts from prospective deals are stored and indexed for retrospective post-analysis: pull any past pitch, compare claims against what the founder said on the call, search across all of them — “who pitched us usage-based pricing?”, “what did we push back on?”

14 · Pitch-deck vault

Decks as a searchable knowledge base

Every deck is extracted into wiki pages — per project and per founder (founder entity pages accumulate across deals). Search by market, metric, claim, or person: “all logistics-marketplace decks from the last year”, “founder X's previous raise — what did the deck claim?” — with pass/invest memos linked.

15 · Watchtower — monitoring & alerts

The internet watches back

Extends the v2 signals job from companies and competitors to industries, and adds alerts: covenant thresholds, milestone slips, negative news about a portfolio company, an industry shock. Alerts fire into a portfolio-wide feed and headline the morning summary. Production already ships the agent's alerts lane — the demo seeds preset rules.

What this costs in mock data

Transcripts and decks, narrated from the same canon

Per company: one board plan + 2 board-call transcripts. Plus a dealflow set of ~10 prospective deals — decks, 3 with pitch-call transcripts, founder pages, pass memos. All generated from the same canonical numbers as the dashboards and wikis, so a transcript never contradicts a chart.

The cast

Five companies, five kinds of PE anxiety

Chosen so the portfolio reads as a real book — each company carries a different risk flavor and a genuinely different KPI vocabulary (ARR/NRR vs. CAC/LTV vs. delinquency vs. TAT/accreditation), which is what makes the graph and the question bank feel real. Names and domains are proposals — Q4.

CompanyDomainHealthThe story
Vortex Gamespreserved anchor customer Mobile & console games studio
DAU/retentionmilestoneslive-ops
Amber The anchor asset: a profitable live-ops hit aging out (DAU down 2 quarters), racing a new title to a holiday launch that has to reignite growth.
Portside Softwareinvented Vertical B2B SaaS — freight TMS
ARR/NRRpipelinecoverage
Green The growth story: ARR +38% YoY on a strong new-logo motion — but NRR slid 118%→109% as the smallest-customer segment frays.
Solstice Outdoorinvented D2C + wholesale outdoor gear
CAC/LTVchannel mixcohorts
Amber The margin story: paid acquisition stopped paying for itself, and the wholesale fallback is now concentrated in one big-box partner (~34% of revenue).
Northlane Financialinvented Fintech — invoice lending for SMB manufacturers
delinquencycharge-offscovenants
Red / Watch The risk story: real loan-book growth, but 60+ day delinquency just crossed the 3.5% covenant-relevant threshold. The board needs to see it now.
Meridian Clinical Labsinvented Healthcare — diagnostic-lab roll-up (platform + 2 add-ons)
TATpayer mixsynergies
Green, ops flag The integration story: on-plan financially — except the newest site is behind on systems migration and its CLIA recertification clock is ticking.
Killer user stories

The nine scenes the demo is built around

Each scene defines exactly what the mock data must be able to support: the question, the surfaces it touches, and the citation trail it must produce. These are the demo script.

Scene 1 — “Why did delinquency spike?”

DashboardChat

Northlane Financial. The associate opens the Credit & Loan Book dashboard; the 60+ day delinquency tile is red — 4.2% against the 3.5% covenant threshold.

“Why did 60+ day delinquency spike this quarter at Northlane?”

The agent segments the loan book by origination cohort, finds the Q2-2026 manufacturing-vertical cohort driving it, and surfaces the credit-committee memo that had already flagged underwriting-model drift — answer in 2–3 sentences with citation pills into entities/decisions/q2-credit-policy-review.md and the board-deck raw dump.

Scene 2 — “Which company is most exposed?”

GraphChatCross-portfolio

All five companies. From the portfolio graph:

“Which of our five companies has the highest customer or channel concentration risk, and what should I ask management first?”

The agent compares Solstice's top-wholesale-account concentration (~34% of revenue) against Portside's healthiest-in-book 6%, ranks all five, cites both companies' wikis — one agent turn across the whole portfolio. This scene is why the architecture uses a single wiki root with five company subtrees.

Scene 3 — “Will the new title ship?”

DashboardChat

Vortex Games. The Development & Live-Ops dashboard shows Beta slipped two weeks.

“Is the new title still on track for the holiday launch window?”

The agent answers from milestone dates and burndown, cites the title's entity page and a Jira-shaped raw dump documenting the certification-blocking crash bug, and gives a calibrated answer: still inside the window, nine days of buffer.

Scene 4 — “What's our biggest bookings risk?”

DashboardChat

Portside Software. On the Sales Pipeline dashboard, an $820K “Committed” deal sits 45 days past its expected close.

“What's our biggest risk to hitting Q4 bookings?”

The agent surfaces that exact deal, cites the email thread where the champion went quiet, and the account entity page noting a leadership change at the prospect. Numbers, narrative, and next action in one answer.

Scene 5 — “One-line portfolio health check”

VoiceCross-portfolio

Portfolio-wide, away from the screen. The associate taps the mic on Portfolio Home:

“Give me a one-line health check across the portfolio.”

The Realtime voice session calls ask_portfolio_brain — the demo's portfolio-scoped sibling of production's ask_company_brain — and speaks: “Four of five are on track. Northlane's delinquency crossed the 3.5% covenant threshold this month — worth a call this week. Vortex's new title slipped two weeks but still has runway to the holiday date.” The full written, cited answer renders on screen simultaneously — the production voice persona rules (never read tables aloud) carry over unchanged.

Scene 6 — “How are our competitors doing?”

DashboardChatLive web

Solstice Outdoor. The associate opens the Competitive Matrix; a competitor's row is flagged.

“How are Solstice's competitors doing — and where can we take share?”

The agent combines Solstice's own wiki numbers (CAC by channel, contribution margin) with live web citations from the daily sweep: one competitor just raised prices ~8% on its bestselling tent line while its review score slid a third of a star; another quietly cut its German paid campaigns. Answer: “the opening is a spring push on exactly that category in DACH — their price umbrella covers your margin problem.” The production “part of this answer came from the internet” notice appears on the answer, with clickable web sources next to wiki citation pills.

Scene 7 — “What's new since Friday?”

VoiceTasksMorning summary

Monday, 7:55, before the partner call. The morning summary card is already on Portfolio Home; the associate taps the mic:

“What's new since Friday?”

Voice: “Three things. Northlane's covenant letter draft is ready for your review. Portside's stalled $820K deal finally has a meeting — Thursday. And one of Solstice's competitors launched a 20%-off campaign in Germany over the weekend — the counter-move task is on Solstice's board, waiting on budget sign-off.” On screen: the briefing with a citation per line — a wiki page, a task link, a web source — and the “launch ads in Germany” task one click from being unblocked.

Scene 8 — “What aren't they telling us?”

ChatAlignmentBoard calls

Vortex Games. The Alignment tab shows the plan mostly green — but the associate has learned to ask the harder question:

“Is Vortex actually on plan — and where are the bottlenecks management isn't voicing?”

The agent cross-references the board-approved milestone plan against the dev-status data and raw signals: the cert QA queue has grown three sprints straight, one engineer is the single owner of the launch-blocking crash bug, and a senior QA req has sat open for 60 days — none of it in the last board deck. It also quotes the last board call: management committed to “cert-ready by October 1”, which the current queue math contradicts. Every claim carries a citation — plan page, Jira dump, transcript line.

Scene 9 — “Have we seen this pitch before?”

ChatDealflow

Dealflow vault. A new logistics-marketplace deck just arrived. Before the call:

“Pull everything we've seen on logistics marketplaces in the last year — decks, calls, and why we passed.”

The agent surfaces three past deals from the vault: the decks' key claims side by side, the pitch-call moments where each founder was pushed on take-rate, the two pass memos — and flags that one of those founders is now raising again with a pivoted deck already in the inbox. Retrospective search across decks, calls, and people, in one answer.

Pre-built dashboards

Seven dashboard families, one honest number set

Recommended shape (see Q3): every company gets a P&L and a Competitive Matrix — financials and competitive position comparable across the book — plus one domain-flavored dashboard each, and a portfolio roll-up above them. Pre-built views are deterministic React charts themed on LiveCEO's design tokens (pixel-identical every run); the production LLM artifact pipeline is reserved for the generated artifacts — SWOTs, decks, one-pagers — that land in the same gallery on demand.

Portfolio Overview — sits above the five

Portfolio Home
  • Health heatmap — 5 companies × Financial / Ops / Risk
  • Aggregate revenue & EBITDA roll-up, stacked by company
  • Cross-portfolio risk & milestone watchlist
  • Entry point into the portfolio knowledge graph

P&L

All five companies — identical widgets, comparable at a glance
  • Revenue trend (18–24 mo) with YoY overlay
  • Gross margin % + EBITDA margin trend
  • Opex breakdown (COGS / S&M / R&D / G&A)
  • Cash, monthly burn, runway tile
  • Budget-vs-actual variance, current quarter
  • KPI scorecard row incl. headcount

Sales Pipeline

Portside Software
  • Funnel with stage-conversion %
  • ARR bridge (new / expansion / contraction / churn)
  • NRR trend + win-rate trend
  • Pipeline coverage vs. quarter target
  • Top-10 open deals table

Development & Live-Ops

Vortex Games
  • New-title milestone timeline (preprod → cert → launch)
  • Sprint burndown / velocity
  • Bug backlog by severity
  • DAU/MAU, D1/D7/D30 retention, ARPDAU
  • Platform certification tracker

Marketing & Unit Economics

Solstice Outdoor
  • Revenue by channel (DTC / wholesale / marketplace)
  • CAC by channel + LTV:CAC trend
  • Contribution margin per order
  • Cohort repeat-purchase curve
  • Top-5 wholesale concentration tile

Credit & Loan Book

Northlane Financial
  • Originations trend (volume + count)
  • Outstanding balance by risk tier
  • Delinquency 30/60/90+ with covenant line
  • Net charge-offs + yield / NIM
  • Compliance flags (licensing, open audits)

Integration & Compliance Ops

Meridian Clinical Labs
  • Revenue & test volume by site
  • Turnaround-time trend per site
  • Integration milestone tracker
  • CLIA/CAP accreditation traffic lights
  • Synergy capture: realized vs. target

Competitive Matrix — new in v2

All five companies — real competitors, live web sources
  • Head-to-head table vs. 3–4 named competitors
  • Recent competitor moves timeline (web-cited)
  • Review-score / share-of-voice trend
  • Threat flags — where they're beating us
  • Openings — where they're vulnerable

Generated artifacts — on demand

Any company, from chat — lands in the same gallery
  • “Make me a SWOT of [Company]”
  • “A one-pager for the LP call”
  • “Deck: [Company] in five slides”
  • Production artifact pipeline, sandboxed & shareable

The 46-question bank

The canonical questions PE associates ask — the mock data is generated specifically so every one of these is answerable with citations. They double as suggested-prompt chips in chat and voice.

Cross-portfolio (10)
  1. Give me a one-paragraph health check across all five portfolio companies.
  2. Which company has the lowest EBITDA margin this quarter, and why?
  3. Rank the five companies by revenue growth YoY.
  4. Which companies are burning cash, and what's their runway?
  5. Which portfolio company has the highest customer or channel concentration risk?
  6. What's aggregate portfolio EBITDA this quarter vs. last quarter?
  7. Which company had the biggest negative surprise this month?
  8. Are any covenant thresholds at risk anywhere in the portfolio?
  9. Which company has had recent leadership turnover, and does it correlate with performance?
  10. Summarize the single biggest risk in the portfolio right now.
Per-company financials — template applies to any company (5)
  1. What was [Company]'s revenue and EBITDA last month vs. plan?
  2. What's driving the gross-margin change at [Company] this quarter?
  3. What's [Company]'s cash runway at current burn?
  4. Where is [Company]'s opex growing fastest?
  5. Is [Company] on track to hit its annual budget?
Portside — SaaS pipeline (4)
  1. What's Portside's pipeline coverage ratio against the Q4 target?
  2. Which deals in Portside's pipeline are stalled or at risk?
  3. What's driving the change in Portside's net revenue retention?
  4. Who are Portside's top 3 at-risk renewal accounts this quarter?
Vortex Games — development status (4)
  1. Is the new title on track for its planned launch window?
  2. Is DAU/retention on the live title still declining, and by how much?
  3. What are the top open blockers in the current development milestone?
  4. Which platform certifications are still pending for the new title?
Solstice — D2C economics (3) · Northlane — credit (2) · Meridian — integration (2)
  1. What's Solstice's CAC trend by channel — is paid acquisition still profitable?
  2. How concentrated is Solstice's revenue in its top wholesale accounts?
  3. What's the repeat-purchase rate for the last two acquisition cohorts?
  4. What's driving the change in Northlane's net charge-off rate this quarter?
  5. What's Northlane's loan-book concentration by industry vertical?
  6. Is Meridian on schedule for synergy capture?
  7. Are all three Meridian sites in good CLIA/CAP standing?
Competitors · web signals · tasks · briefing — new in v2 (8)
  1. How are [Company]'s competitors doing this quarter?
  2. Where is [competitor] beating us — and where are they vulnerable?
  3. What's being said about [Company] online this week?
  4. Did anything happen overnight I should know about?
  5. What's the status of opening the bank account for [Company]?
  6. Which tasks across the portfolio are blocked or overdue?
  7. Make me a SWOT analysis of [Company].
  8. Make me a one-slide deck about [Company] for the LP meeting.
Alignment · board calls · dealflow · alerts — new in v3 (8)
  1. Is [Company] on plan against the board-approved budget and milestones?
  2. Where are [Company]'s bottlenecks that management isn't flagging?
  3. What commitments did management make on the last board call — and which are already slipping?
  4. What changed in [Company]'s plan after the last board meeting?
  5. What did [founder] claim in their deck — and did the numbers hold up on the call?
  6. Which pitches have we seen in [industry] in the last year, and why did we pass?
  7. What alerts fired across the portfolio this week?
  8. What's happening in [industry] that affects our companies?
Architecture

Built fresh — from proven parts

A new standalone app (recommended: its own repo — Q10) on the same stack: Next.js 16, React 19, Tailwind v4, TypeScript strict. No WorkOS, no Postgres multi-tenancy, no connectors, no gVisor sandbox — the demo carries none of production's SaaS weight. The research pass confirmed every lifted part below by reading the actual code.

Lifted from LiveCEO, near-verbatim

  • The whole agent engineagentCore.ts (~1,700 lines): claude-agent-sdk turn assembly, wiki-navigation system prompt, Read/Grep/Glob-only tool surface. Unmodified.
  • The path jailwikiContainment.ts: every file read realpath-checked against the wiki root. Works identically without gVisor.
  • The voice stackvoiceClient.ts (~300-line WebRTC / OpenAI Realtime driver, framework-free) + the ephemeral-secret minting route. The research confirmed the tool-callback seam needs zero client changes.
  • The graph rendererGraphCanvas / GraphView / graphTheme + buildGraph(). Entity types are emergent strings, so PE vocabulary (company, covenant, deal) needs no renderer change.
  • CitationsMarkdown.tsx wiki-pill rendering, repointed at a filesystem-backed wiki route.
  • Design systemglobals.css @theme tokens, Cal Sans/Inter/JetBrains Mono, landing/shared.tsx primitives, AppShell/TabRail as visual template.
  • Wiki conventions — index + entities/<type>/<slug>.md + raw/<system>/… layout, frontmatter and linking rules, so the unmodified agent prompt still describes reality.
  • The web lane (v2) — production's Perplexity-backed web search: wiki-first gate, per-turn cap, cited sources, the “from the internet” notice. Powers competitor intel and the signals sweep.
  • The tasks tracker (v2) — the board/list/detail UI + tasks dataset LiveCEO shipped this month, lifted as the per-company task surface.
  • The artifact pipeline (v2) — the LLM document generator + sandboxed-iframe gallery, now promoted from “cut” to the engine behind generated SWOTs/decks/one-pagers.
  • Alerts lane + meetings conventions (v3) — production's alert tools and persistence, the decisions & meetings surfaces in the tracker, and the wiki's recorded-meetings raw-source shape: the rails under board-call analysis and the watchtower.

New engineering (nothing like it exists yet)

  • Mock-corpus generator — authors 4 synthetic company wikis (raw dumps first, then curated entities) conforming to LiveCEO's wiki conventions. The central missing piece; no “synthesize a company” tool exists today.
  • Canonical-numbers pipeline — the honesty machinery below. Numbers decided once, everything derived.
  • Portfolio graph layer — fund → companies → bridge people. Confirmed by four independent research passes: no cross-company aggregation exists anywhere in the codebase.
  • Dashboard components — LiveCEO has no charting library at all (production dashboards are LLM-generated HTML). New deterministic React charts (Recharts + the dataviz conventions), themed on the same tokens.
  • Trimmed ask route — SSE streaming + citations only; production's 781-line chat route sheds admission queues, plan allowances, access policies, write-tools.
  • PE question bank + scenes content — no PE/finance vocabulary exists anywhere in the product today.
  • Vortex preservation pass — export via the existing backup tool, then the existing anonymization pipeline, gated by human review (see Risk 1 / Q2).
  • Competitor registry + Matrix layout (v2) — a curated allowlist of 3–4 real competitors per company (disambiguated, so scrapes never pull the wrong “Solstice”), and the head-to-head dashboard built on it.
  • Signals sweep job + morning summary (v2) — a daily job writing raw/web/… dumps per company/competitor, and a briefing generator that digests overnight signals, task moves and metric deltas into one cited card.
  • Plan registry + drift radar (v3) — board-approved plans as first-class pages, agent-computed plan-vs-actual drift, and unvoiced-bottleneck detection from raw signals; auto-actualized after each board call.
  • Dealflow vault (v3) — deck extraction into searchable project pages + founder entity pages that accumulate across deals, pitch-call transcripts, pass/invest memos, cross-deal comparison search.

Why the numbers can't disagree

The single hardest requirement: a dashboard saying ARR is $4.2M while chat cites $3.8M kills the demo in one click. So numbers are decided exactly once, and everything else is derived:

Canonical financial model per company. A seeded, deterministic generator produces each company's numbers as structured JSON — with identities enforced in code: EBITDA = revenue − COGS − opex, funnel stages sum, retention compounds, delinquency buckets total the loan book.
Dashboards read those exact numbers. Static JSON per company/dashboard — no LLM, no variance, instant render.
The wiki is narrated around them. Slack threads, Jira tickets, board-deck excerpts and entity pages are LLM-written with the canonical figures passed as hard constraints — the model never invents a number.
An offline consistency lint gates the build. Every numeric mention in generated prose is diffed against the canonical values; drift fails the corpus build. A wrong number becomes a build bug, never a live-demo risk.

One wiki root, five subtrees

All five companies live as subtrees under one wiki root. That's what lets a single agent turn answer “which company has the worst margin trend?” by walking across companies — and it reuses the agent engine, the path jail, and the graph builder with zero modification. Production-style per-tenant isolation is a story this demo doesn't need to tell: none of the data is real (and the Vortex copy is gated — Q2).

liveceo-pe-demo/ src/app/ page.tsx # Portfolio Home — graph + KPI strip + voice dock company/[slug]/page.tsx # header + tabs: Dashboards | Graph | Chat api/ask/route.ts # NEW — trimmed SSE agent route (scope: portfolio | company) api/voice/session/route.ts # lifted — PE persona, ask_portfolio_brain tool api/wiki/[...path]/route.ts # serves wiki pages from the filesystem src/lib/ agentCore.ts · wikiContainment.ts · voiceClient.ts · graph.ts # lifted unmodified portfolioGraph.ts # NEW — fund/company/bridge-people graph src/components/ graph/* · Markdown.tsx · shared.tsx # lifted dashboards/* # NEW — deterministic charts × 6 types data/ wikis/{vortex-games,portside,solstice,northlane,meridian}/ # generated corpora dashboards/<slug>/*.json # canonical numbers, same source as wiki prose killer-questions.ts # the 30-question bank as prompt chips scripts/ generate-mock-wiki.mjs # NEW — numbers-first corpus generator anonymize-vortex.mjs # wraps the existing anonymization pipeline (gated)
Build sequence

Every phase is something you can click

~30–40 developer-days total (6–7 calendar weeks for one engineer; content generation parallelizes with UI once the wiki file shape is fixed). Phases 1–4 are the clickable core; 5–7 the operating layer (v2); 8–10 the investor layer (v3). Each phase ends in a walkthrough you can react to before the next begins — and the layers are independently shippable if you want to demo earlier.

PhaseYou get to clickEffort
0 · FoundationsFresh app scaffold, design tokens ported, fonts, deploy pipeline smoke-tested. (Not independently demoable.)1–1.5 d
1 · “Here's your empire”App shell + portfolio graph with 5 company nodes → click through to each company's own knowledge graph → every node opens a real wiki page. Runs on the first thin corpus.3–4 d
2 · “Here's the numbers”All six dashboards live on canonical mock numbers; portfolio roll-up tile on home.3–4 d
3 · “Ask it anything”Chat with the real agent over the mock wikis — killer-question chips, streaming answers, citation pills opening the reader.2–3 d
4 · “Talk to your portfolio”Voice dock on every page, scoped to where you are. This completes the clickable core.1.5–2 d
5 · “How do we beat them?”Competitor registry, daily web-signals sweep, Competitive Matrix on every company, web-cited chat answers with the “from the internet” notice.2.5–3.5 d
6 · “What's moving?”Per-company task boards seeded with real-feeling ops tasks (entity registration, bank account, German ads campaign); morning summary card + voice readout.2–3 d
7 · “Make me a deck”Generated SWOT / one-pager / deck from chat, landing in the company's gallery. This completes the v2 feature set.1.5–2 d
8 · “Are they on plan?”Board plans as wiki pages, board-call transcripts + structured digests, the Alignment tab with drift and unvoiced-bottleneck flags, plan auto-actualization into tasks and decisions.3–4 d
9 · “The dealflow vault”New Dealflow area: ~10 mock deals — decks extracted into searchable pages, founder entities, 3 pitch-call transcripts, pass memos, cross-deal search.3–4 d
10 · “Watchtower”Preset alert rules (covenant, milestone slip, negative news, industry shock) + portfolio alerts feed, headlining the morning summary. This completes the v3 feature set.1.5–2 d
11 · Corpus depth + VortexDeepen the four synthetic corpora to a few hundred pages each; run the gated Vortex export → anonymize → human-review pass and swap it in. Ships on its own timeline, never blocks 1–10.3–5 d
12 · StretchShareable dashboard links; push delivery of the morning summary (email/Telegram); configurable alert-rules UI; dictation in the composer.deferred
Risks

What could sink it, and the mitigation

Ranked. The first one is the only one with real-world blast radius.

1 · Vortex Games data leaking into a demo shown to outsiders — highest severity

Vortex is a real customer. The repo's own anonymization pipeline documents that on a comparable prior run, the automated scrub still left 71 real leaks (names, a plaintext auth token, staging IPs, an address inside a base64 calendar id) — caught only by two human adversarial review passes.

Mitigation: hard release gate, not a checklist item. MVP ships with a synthetic Vortex-styled stand-in; the real corpus enters only after export → automated rewrite → leak scan → two independent human passes → written sign-off. Decision is yours — Q2.

2 · Mock data feels fake or doesn't reconcile

One mismatched number between a dashboard and a chat answer collapses credibility in a single click.

Mitigation: the canonical-numbers-first pipeline plus the offline consistency lint (Architecture §) — agreement is mechanical, not hoped-for. Plus a golden-question regression run of all 30 bank questions before any important showing.

3 · The graph reads as a toy

A force graph with a dozen generic nodes signals “demo,” not “the AI actually ingested this company.”

Mitigation: generate real depth (target ~150–300 information-dense pages per company, deepening in Phase 5), reuse the deterministic hub pages (org chart, decision log) as high-degree anchors, and enforce no dead ends — every clickable node opens a substantive cited page.

4 · Voice quality in the actual room

Realtime WebRTC on venue wifi, laptop-mic echo, and a 30–120s research-tool window can produce dead air mid-pitch.

Mitigation: rehearse on the venue network with a dedicated headset mic; the typed composer sits right next to the mic toggle and routes through the identical answer pipeline, so falling back mid-demo costs nothing.

5 · Live-agent cost and safety if the link escapes

Every turn is a real Sonnet call; every voice minute is metered Realtime. Fine when operator-driven; unbounded if a public link circulates.

Mitigation: shared-passcode gate + per-session turn caps by default (Q6/Q7). If unsupervised prospect access is ever wanted, that's a scope change: hard caps and sandbox revisited first.

6 · Live web content on stage is unpredictable (new with the competitive lane)

A live scrape can surface junk, a same-name company (“Solstice” has real namesakes), stale news, or nothing new — mid-pitch.

Mitigation: a curated, disambiguated competitor allowlist per company; the daily cached sweep is the default source the agent cites (live search stays available but is never the only path); pin a rehearsal-day snapshot before important showings so the demo never depends on what the internet did overnight.

7 · Mock transcripts are the hardest content to fake well (new with board/pitch calls)

Stilted, too-clean dialogue reads instantly fake — a board call where everyone speaks in complete sentences breaks immersion faster than a wrong number.

Mitigation: generate transcripts from real board-meeting and pitch structure templates with imperfect, interrupted speech; every number in them comes from the canonical model; and the demo shows the analysis (digest, commitments, contradictions), never long raw-transcript reading — excerpts surface only as short cited quotes.

Your call

Sixteen open questions that shape the build

Each comes with a recommended default — answer with a number and “yes” or a correction. Q1 and Q2 matter most; Q11–13 came with the operating layer (v2), Q14–16 with the investor layer (v3); everything else has a safe default.

1

Who sees this demo, and how? Live pitch you drive · self-serve link for PE firms · internal/investor storytelling?

Drives the auth model, cost guardrails, whether unsupervised strangers hit live LLM/voice sessions, and how hard the Vortex privacy gate must be.

RecommendedOperator-driven live pitch for v1 — lowest risk, fastest build, matches how PE tools are actually sold. Self-serve becomes a deliberate v2 with hard caps.

2

Vortex Games: real anonymized copy of the production wiki, or a fully synthetic Vortex-styled company?

“Preserve the copy of Vortex Games” can mean either. Real data is maximally authentic but is a real customer's data — the prior anonymization run's 71 post-scrub leaks make this the project's only genuine incident risk, and it needs your sign-off plus review time.

RecommendedSynthetic Vortex-styled stand-in for the MVP; run the gated export → anonymize → two-human-pass pipeline in parallel (Phase 5) and swap the real corpus in only after written sign-off.

3

Dashboards: P&L for every company + one domain dashboard each (11 views), or literally one dashboard type per company (5 views)?

Your brief reads either way. Comparable financials across the whole book is the stronger PE story, but it's roughly double the dashboard build.

RecommendedP&L everywhere + one specialty each — the P&L component is built once and themed per company, so the real extra cost is data generation, not five new UIs.

4

Are the four invented companies right? Portside Software (freight SaaS) · Solstice Outdoor (D2C) · Northlane Financial (SMB lending) · Meridian Clinical Labs (healthcare roll-up)

Names and domains propagate into hundreds of generated pages, dataset labels, and voice transcripts — renaming after generation means regenerating the corpus, not find-and-replace.

RecommendedProceed with these four (each carries a distinct PE risk flavor: retention, margin/concentration, credit/covenant, integration/compliance), with a quick trademark sanity check before the first generation run.

5

Live agent answers, or scripted/canned ones?

Live = the real “it's actually reasoning over the wiki” effect, plus graceful handling when an associate goes off-script; costs latency and a small hallucination risk. Canned = 100% reliable, but collapses the moment anyone asks their own question.

RecommendedLive agent for both chat and voice. The corpus is small and fully known, and the golden-question regression run before each showing is the safety net.

6

Data plumbing: filesystem-only (static JSON dashboards, no database), or stand up the SQL dataset lane so the agent runs real queries?

Filesystem-only keeps the entire demo self-contained — no Postgres anywhere — and dashboards render instantly. The SQL lane (production's query_dataset) adds a “watch it write real SQL” demo beat and numeric verification, at the cost of a database and the dataset machinery.

RecommendedFilesystem-only for v1; the numbers already agree by construction. Add a per-company SQLite file later only if you want the live-SQL moment on stage.

7

Access: open link, single shared passcode, or full WorkOS login?

Production's WorkOS + org-claim machinery is heavy for a fixed-cast demo; a bare public URL risks the link (and any Vortex-derived content) leaking or being crawled.

RecommendedSingle shared passcode — one gate, no accounts, revocable by rotating it.

8

Where does it run — and at what address?

Same Hetzner box as production (new subdomain, fully separate container, zero shared DB) reuses proven Caddy/TLS ops with near-zero new infra. A separate host (Vercel/Fly) gives total isolation but new deploy tooling. The name also sets the demo's framing (e.g. portfolio.liveceo.ai vs. a standalone brand).

RecommendedSame Hetzner box, separate container, portfolio.liveceo.ai — proven ops, zero production coupling.

9

Corpus depth: thin-but-real first (~40–80 pages per company for Phases 1–4), or full depth (~150–300+) before you first click through?

Content generation is the longest pole (3–5 days at full depth). Thin-first gets you clicking a week earlier and lets you correct the shape before deep investment; but the graph impresses in proportion to its density.

RecommendedThin-but-real for the first walkthrough, then deepen in Phase 5 once you've confirmed the shape — the generator makes depth a re-run, not a rebuild.

10

Repo strategy: fresh repo (liveceo-pe-demo) or a folder inside the main product repo?

A fresh repo makes “zero coupling to production auth/DB/tenancy” structural and matches “built from scratch”; a folder keeps everything in one place but invites entanglement and would need monorepo tooling the repo doesn't have.

RecommendedFresh repo, with one-time file copies from LiveCEO (free to diverge) rather than submodules.

11

Competitors for the invented four: real companies (live scraping, real news), or invented competitors (fully controlled, no live web)?

Real competitors make the Competitive Matrix and web-signals lane genuinely live — the demo becomes unfakeable, because the news is checkable. Invented competitors are risk-free but turn “how are competitors doing?” into just more mock data.

RecommendedReal competitors, curated allowlist — the portfolio company is fictional but its market is real (real outdoor brands for Solstice, real TMS vendors for Portside). For Vortex, the real competitive set follows the Q2 decision.

12

Morning summary delivery: in-app card + voice readout only, or also pushed out (email / Telegram) every morning?

In-app + voice is fully inside the demo's own surfaces and always rehearsable. Push delivery is a strong “it lives with you” story but adds channel wiring and a flakiness surface on stage.

RecommendedIn-app + voice for v1, push channels as the Phase 9 stretch — the on-stage version of this beat is tapping the mic, not checking email.

13

Tasks in the demo: fully editable tracker (move statuses, add tasks live), or read-mostly seeded boards?

Moving “open the German ad account” to Done live in front of the room is a strong moment — but an edited demo drifts from the rehearsed script and the morning summary that referenced it.

RecommendedEditable, with one-click reset to the seeded state — you get the live moment, and every session starts from the same known board.

14

Dealflow: full sixth area (deck vault + pitch calls + founder pages), or portfolio-only for now?

Dealflow is effectively a second product surface — it's what makes the demo speak to the investing half of a family office, not just the owning half. But it's ~3–4 days of build plus its own mock-content set (~10 deals).

RecommendedIn, but thin — ~10 mock deals, 3 with call transcripts, founder pages, pass memos. It powers Scene 9, which no competitor demo can casually replicate.

15

Board and pitch calls: transcripts only, or also mock audio recordings?

Transcripts are what the agent actually analyzes and searches — audio adds production weight (voice acting or TTS per speaker) mostly for theater. One playable snippet can add authenticity; full audio libraries add nothing analytical.

RecommendedTranscripts only — the demo's magic is the analysis, not playback. Revisit a single showcase snippet only if a specific pitch beat wants it.

16

Alerts: preset rules that visibly fire in the demo, or a user-configurable rules UI?

Preset rules (covenant crossed, milestone slipped, negative news, industry shock) give a reliable, rehearsable alerts feed. A rules-builder UI is real product surface — days of work the demo script may never open.

RecommendedPreset rules + the portfolio alerts feed, headlining the morning summary; the configurable rules UI goes to stretch (Phase 12).

Fastest way to unblock the build

Reply in chat with something like: “1 live-pitch · 2 synthetic-first · 3 P&L-everywhere · 4 yes · 5 live · 6 filesystem · 7 passcode · 8 portfolio.liveceo.ai · 9 thin-first · 10 fresh repo · 11 real-competitors · 12 in-app · 13 editable · 14 dealflow-thin · 15 transcripts · 16 preset-alerts” — or correct any line. Accepting all recommendations as-is also works: “all defaults”.